Table 2 |
||||||
| Results of Multiple Logistic Stepwise Regression Predicting Post-trauma Outcome from the Set of Pre-trauma Variables | ||||||
| Maximized Sample | ||||||
| Outcome | Selected | Odds | Wald | |||
| Measure | N | Predictor(s) | Ratio | Chi-Square | df | p |
| IES-R | 96 | Shipley Est. IQ | 0.95 | 4.28 | 1 | .039 |
| EMG Diff_E1 | 1.17 | 4.46 | 1 | .035 | ||
| BDI-II | 1.15 | 3.50 | 1 | .062 | ||
| Post. Prob. | 95 | Shipley Est. IQ | 0.94 | 5.72 | 1 | .017 |
| SC Mean Resp. | 4.02 | 3.70 | 1 | .055 | ||
Note: Post. Prob. = Posterior Probability score derived from script-driven imagery assessment; IES-R = Impact of Event Scale-Revised total score; Shipley Est. IQ = Estimated WAIS-R Full Scale IQ from Shipley Institute of Living Scale; EMG Diff_E1 = corrugator electromyogram differential response during extinction, i.e., the averaged CS interval response to the first five CS + trials minus the averaged CS interval response to the first five CS- trials for the extinction phase; BDI-II = Beck Depression Inventory-II score; SC Mean Resp. = Skin conductance mean response to loud-tone presentations.
Orr et al. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders 2012 2:8 doi:10.1186/2045-5380-2-8
